How Hollywood is changing the fate of iconic heroes: a historical and cultural analysis

When we think of Hollywood heroes, we often think of characters who are larger than life, who inspire us, who make us laugh, who make us cry, who make us feel. Characters like Han Solo, Rocky Balboa, Indiana Jones, and many others have become part of our collective imagination and culture, and we have grown to love them and identify with them.

But what happens when Hollywood decides to mess with our heroes? What happens when they kill them off, or make them suffer, or make them old, or make them irrelevant? How do we react to these changes, and why do they affect us so much?

In this article, we will try to answer these questions by looking at some examples of how Hollywood has changed the fate of some iconic heroes, and what psychological effects these changes have on us as the audience. We will also examine the historical and cultural context behind these changes, and how they reflect the evolution of storytelling and society.

Let's start with one of the most shocking and controversial examples of Hollywood messing with our heroes: the death of Han Solo in Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Han Solo, played by Harrison Ford, was one of the most beloved characters in the Star Wars franchise, and one of the most iconic heroes in cinema history. He was a charming rogue, a witty smuggler, a loyal friend, a brave fighter, and a romantic hero. He was also one of the main protagonists of the original trilogy, and a key figure in the rebellion against the evil Empire.

So why did Hollywood decide to kill him off? Why did they make him face his own son, Kylo Ren, who had turned to the dark side, and who stabbed him with his lightsaber in front of millions of fans? What was the point of this tragic and heartbreaking scene?

According to the filmmakers, the death of Han Solo was a necessary and meaningful part of the story, and a way of passing the torch to the new generation of heroes. J.J. Abrams, the director of The Force Awakens, said that Han Solo's death was "a chess move" that allowed the new characters, such as Rey, Finn, and Poe, to take center stage and grow as heroes. He also said that Han Solo's death was a way of showing the stakes and the danger of the conflict, and a way of making Kylo Ren a more complex and compelling villain.

But how did the fans react to this change? How did they feel about losing one of their favorite heroes? Well, the reactions were mixed, to say the least. Some fans accepted and appreciated the death of Han Solo, and saw it as a powerful and emotional moment that made the story more impactful and meaningful. They also understood the narrative and thematic reasons behind the decision, and praised the performance of Harrison Ford and Adam Driver, who played Han Solo and Kylo Ren, respectively.

Other fans, however, were outraged and devastated by the death of Han Solo, and saw it as a betrayal and a disrespect to the character and the legacy of Star Wars. They also criticized the narrative and thematic reasons behind the decision, and argued that it was a cheap and lazy way of creating drama and shock value, and that it ruined the character arc and the development of Han Solo and Kylo Ren. They also expressed their disappointment and anger towards the filmmakers, and even threatened to boycott the franchise.

So why did the death of Han Solo have such a strong and polarizing effect on the fans? What psychological factors influenced their reactions and emotions? To answer these questions, we need to look at some concepts and theories from psychology, such as attachment, identification, nostalgia, and expectations.

The psychological impact of killing off beloved characters on the audience and the story

As we have seen, the death of Han Solo in Star Wars: The Force Awakens was a major change that had a huge impact on the fans and the story. But why did it affect us so much? What psychological processes were involved in our reactions and emotions?

One of the main factors that influenced our response to the death of Han Solo was our attachment to the character. Attachment is a psychological concept that describes the emotional bond that we form with others, such as our parents, friends, partners, or even fictional characters. Attachment is important for our well-being, as it provides us with a sense of security, comfort, and belonging. Attachment also shapes our identity, as it influences our self-esteem, values, and goals.

When we watch a movie or a TV show, we often form attachments to the characters that we like, admire, or relate to. We care about what happens to them, we feel happy when they succeed, we feel sad when they suffer, and we feel angry when they are wronged. We also project ourselves onto them, and imagine what we would do or feel in their situations. This is called identification, and it is another psychological concept that explains how we connect with fictional characters.

Attachment and identification are the reasons why we feel so invested in the stories and the fates of our favorite characters. They are also the reasons why we feel so devastated when they die or change in a way that we don't like. When a character that we are attached to or identify with dies, we experience a sense of loss, grief, and mourning, similar to what we would feel if we lost a real person that we loved. We may also feel betrayed, confused, or angry, especially if we think that the death was unnecessary, unjustified, or poorly executed.

The death of a beloved character can also have an impact on the story itself, and on how we perceive and evaluate it. Depending on how the death is portrayed, it can either enhance or diminish the quality and the meaning of the story. For example, the death of a character can be seen as a positive or a negative thing, depending on the following factors:

• The motivation and the intention behind the death. Was the death planned or unplanned? Was it voluntary or involuntary? Was it heroic or tragic? Was it meaningful or pointless?
• The consequences and the implications of the death. How did the death affect the other characters and the plot? How did it affect the themes and the messages of the story? How did it affect the tone and the mood of the story?
• The presentation and the execution of the death. How was the death shown and described? How was the death timed and paced? How was the death framed and emphasized? How was the death reacted and responded to?

Depending on these factors, the death of a character can either make the story more engaging, meaningful, and memorable, or make it more boring, confusing, and forgettable. The death of a character can also either make the story more consistent, coherent, and credible, or make it more contradictory, illogical, and unbelievable.

For example, the death of Han Solo in Star Wars: The Force Awakens can be seen as a positive or a negative thing, depending on how we interpret and evaluate the factors mentioned above. Some fans may see the death of Han Solo as a positive thing, because they think that it was motivated by a noble and dramatic purpose, that it had significant and interesting effects on the other characters and the plot, that it was presented and executed in a powerful and emotional way, and that it made the story more engaging, meaningful, and memorable. Other fans may see the death of Han Solo as a negative thing, because they think that it was motivated by a cheap and lazy reason, that it had negative and boring effects on the other characters and the plot, that it was presented and executed in a weak and disappointing way, and that it made the story more boring, confusing, and forgettable.

As we can see, the death of a beloved character can have a profound psychological impact on the audience and the story, and it can elicit different reactions and emotions depending on how we perceive and evaluate it. The death of a character can also be a risky and controversial decision, as it can either enhance or diminish the quality and the meaning of the story, and it can either please or alienate the fans. Therefore, Hollywood should be careful and respectful when they decide to mess with our heroes, and they should consider the psychological effects that their choices may have on us and on the stories that we love.

The benefits and drawbacks of messing with our heroes: a fan's perspective

In the previous sections, we have discussed some examples and some psychological factors of how Hollywood is messing with our heroes, and how it affects us and the stories. But is messing with our heroes a good or a bad thing? What are the benefits and drawbacks of changing the fate of iconic characters?

As fans, we may have different opinions and preferences about how we want our heroes to be portrayed and treated. Some of us may prefer to see our heroes stay the same as we remember them, and enjoy the familiarity and the consistency of their stories. Some of us may like to see our heroes evolve and change, and appreciate the novelty and the diversity of their stories. Some of us may be open to both possibilities, depending on the context and the execution of the changes.

There is no right or wrong answer to this question, as it depends on our personal tastes and expectations. However, we can try to look at some of the benefits and drawbacks of messing with our heroes from a fan's perspective, and see how they can enhance or diminish our enjoyment and satisfaction of the stories.

Some of the benefits of messing with our heroes are:

• It can create more drama and suspense. By killing off or changing the fate of beloved characters, Hollywood can surprise and shock us, and make us more invested and curious about what will happen next. It can also make the stories more realistic and unpredictable, as it shows that no one is safe and anything can happen.
• It can provide more depth and complexity. By killing off or changing the fate of beloved characters, Hollywood can explore new themes and challenges for the characters and the story. It can also show different sides and perspectives of the characters, and make them more relatable and human.
• It can offer more variety and creativity. By killing off or changing the fate of beloved characters, Hollywood can introduce new characters and scenarios, and expand the scope and the possibilities of the story. It can also avoid repetition and boredom, and keep the stories fresh and exciting.

Some of the drawbacks of messing with our heroes are:

• It can cause more disappointment and frustration. By killing off or changing the fate of beloved characters, Hollywood can upset and anger us, and make us feel betrayed and disrespected. It can also make the stories more confusing and inconsistent, as it contradicts or ignores the established canon and logic of the story.
• It can reduce more attachment and identification. By killing off or changing the fate of beloved characters, Hollywood can alienate and lose us, and make us feel less connected and involved with the characters and the story. It can also diminish the legacy and the impact of the characters, and make them less memorable and iconic.
• It can result in more criticism and backlash. By killing off or changing the fate of beloved characters, Hollywood can face more scrutiny and opposition, and make us more skeptical and cynical about their motives and intentions. It can also spark more controversy and conflict, and divide the fanbase and the community.

As we can see, messing with our heroes can have both positive and negative effects on us and the stories, and it can be a matter of preference and perspective. However, we should also remember that messing with our heroes is not a new or a rare phenomenon, and that it has been done for a long time and for various reasons. For example, some of the most famous and beloved stories in literature, such as Shakespeare's plays, Greek myths, or fairy tales, have been adapted and modified countless times, and have killed off or changed the fate of many iconic characters. And yet, these stories have survived and thrived, and have been enjoyed and appreciated by generations of fans.

Therefore, maybe we should not be too quick to judge or reject the changes that Hollywood makes to our heroes, and maybe we should give them a chance and see how they play out. After all, our heroes are not defined by their fate, but by their actions and their values, and by how they inspire and influence us. And no matter what Hollywood does to them, they will always live on in our hearts and minds.

The role of nostalgia and expectations in shaping our reactions to Hollywood's decisions

Another factor that influences how we react to Hollywood messing with our heroes is nostalgia. Nostalgia is a psychological concept that describes the sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, especially for a period or place with happy personal associations. Nostalgia can be triggered by various stimuli, such as music, smells, images, or events, and it can evoke a range of emotions, such as happiness, sadness, nostalgia, or regret.

Nostalgia can also be induced by media, such as movies, TV shows, books, or games, that feature characters or stories that we have grown up with or have a strong attachment to. When we watch or consume these media, we may feel nostalgic for the past, and for the feelings and memories that they evoke. We may also feel nostalgic for the characters themselves, and for the way they were portrayed and treated in the original or previous versions of the media.

Nostalgia can have both positive and negative effects on us and on our perception of the media. On the one hand, nostalgia can make us feel more connected and satisfied with the media, as it reminds us of the good times and the positive aspects of the characters and the stories. Nostalgia can also make us more forgiving and tolerant of the flaws and the changes that the media may have, as we focus more on the overall impression and the emotional impact that they have on us.

On the other hand, nostalgia can make us feel more disappointed and dissatisfied with the media, as it contrasts with the present and the negative aspects of the characters and the stories. Nostalgia can also make us more critical and resistant to the changes that the media may have, as we compare them with the original or previous versions of the media, and find them lacking or inferior.

The role of nostalgia in shaping our reactions to Hollywood messing with our heroes can be seen in some of the examples that we have discussed earlier. For instance, the death of Han Solo in Star Wars: The Force Awakens may have triggered nostalgia for the fans who grew up with the original trilogy, and who loved and admired Han Solo as a character. Some of these fans may have felt more connected and satisfied with the movie, as it reminded them of the epic and emotional journey that they had with Han Solo and the Star Wars franchise. Other fans may have felt more disappointed and dissatisfied with the movie, as it contrasted with the happy and heroic image that they had of Han Solo and the Star Wars franchise.

Another example of the role of nostalgia in shaping our reactions to Hollywood messing with our heroes can be seen in the case of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. This movie was the fourth installment of the Indiana Jones franchise, and it featured Harrison Ford reprising his role as the adventurous archaeologist, but this time as an old man in the 1950s. The movie also introduced new characters and elements, such as Shia LaBeouf as Indiana Jones' son, and aliens as the main plot device.

The movie received mixed reviews from critics and fans, and many of them cited nostalgia as a factor in their evaluation. Some fans enjoyed the movie, as it brought back the nostalgia of the previous Indiana Jones movies, and as it paid homage to the classic adventure and sci-fi movies of the 1950s. Other fans hated the movie, as it ruined the nostalgia of the previous Indiana Jones movies, and as it deviated from the original tone and style of the franchise.

A related factor that influences how we react to Hollywood messing with our heroes is our expectations. Expectations are the beliefs or the assumptions that we have about how something should be or how it will be. Expectations can be based on various sources, such as our previous experiences, our preferences, our knowledge, or our imagination. Expectations can also be influenced by external factors, such as the media, the marketing, the reviews, or the word-of-mouth.

Expectations can have a significant impact on our perception and evaluation of the media, and especially of the characters and the stories that we are familiar with or attached to. When our expectations are met or exceeded by the media, we tend to feel more satisfied and happy with the media, as it confirms or surpasses our beliefs or assumptions. When our expectations are not met or violated by the media, we tend to feel more dissatisfied and unhappy with the media, as it contradicts or disappoints our beliefs or assumptions.

The role of expectations in shaping our reactions to Hollywood messing with our heroes can also be seen in some of the examples that we have discussed earlier. For example, the death of Han Solo in Star Wars: The Force Awakens may have met or exceeded the expectations of some fans, who expected or hoped for a dramatic and meaningful end for the character, and who appreciated the narrative and thematic reasons behind the decision. The death of Han Solo may have not met or violated the expectations of other fans, who expected or hoped for a happy and heroic end for the character, and who criticized the narrative and thematic reasons behind the decision.

Another example of the role of expectations in shaping our reactions to Hollywood messing with our heroes can be seen in the case of Rocky Balboa having cancer in Creed. This movie was the seventh installment of the Rocky franchise, and it featured Sylvester Stallone reprising his role as the legendary boxer, but this time as a mentor and a trainer for a young fighter, played by Michael B. Jordan. The movie also revealed that Rocky Balboa was diagnosed with cancer, and that he had to face his own mortality and vulnerability.

The movie received positive reviews from critics and fans, and many of them praised the performance of Sylvester Stallone and the portrayal of Rocky Balboa. However, some fans may have had different expectations about how Rocky Balboa should be or how he will be in the movie. Some fans may have expected or hoped for a more upbeat and triumphant story for the character, and may have been surprised or saddened by the cancer storyline. Other fans may have expected or hoped for a more realistic and challenging story for the character, and may have been impressed or moved by the cancer storyline.

As we can see, the role of nostalgia and expectations in shaping our reactions to Hollywood messing with our heroes can be significant and complex, and it can vary depending on the individual and the situation. Nostalgia and expectations can make us more or less satisfied and happy with the media, and they can also make us more or less open and flexible to the changes that the media may have. Therefore, Hollywood should be aware and respectful of the nostalgia and the expectations that the fans may have, and they should try to balance them with their own creative vision and goals.

Certainly! Here's the complete HTML without the word count tags: ```html

The future of Hollywood heroes: will they survive or perish?

So far, we have discussed some of the examples and some of the factors of how Hollywood is messing with our heroes, and how it affects us and the stories. But what does this mean for the future of Hollywood heroes? Will they survive or perish in the next decade?

To answer this question, we need to look at some of the trends and predictions that are shaping the entertainment industry, and how they may impact the creation and the consumption of Hollywood heroes. Some of the trends and predictions that we will consider are:

• The rise of the metaverse and the immersive media
• The emergence of artificial intelligence and the virtual actors
• The evolution of the superhero genre and the cinematic universes
• The diversification of the representation and the audience

Let's start with the rise of the metaverse and the immersive media. The metaverse is a term that describes a shared virtual space that connects different digital platforms and experiences, such as games, social media, e-commerce, education, and entertainment. The metaverse is expected to become the next frontier of the internet, and the next stage of the digital revolution[^1^][1]. The metaverse will enable us to interact with each other and with the media in more immersive and engaging ways, using technologies such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality.

What does this mean for the future of Hollywood heroes? Well, it could mean that we will be able to experience the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes in more realistic and interactive ways, and even become part of them. For example, we could watch a movie in VR, and feel like we are in the same world as the heroes, or even play as them. We could also join a social network in AR, and see our friends as avatars of the heroes, or even create our own. We could also access a game in MR, and blend the real and the virtual worlds, and interact with the heroes and the villains in our own environment.

This could also mean that we will have more control and influence over the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes, and even create our own. For example, we could use a platform like Roblox or Fortnite, and build our own worlds and scenarios, and invite our friends to join us. We could also use a tool like Unreal Engine or Unity, and create our own movies and games, and share them with the world. We could also use a service like Netflix or Disney+, and choose our own endings and outcomes, and customize our own experiences.

The rise of the metaverse and the immersive media could have both positive and negative effects on the future of Hollywood heroes. On the one hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more accessible and enjoyable, and more personalized and participatory. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more diverse and creative, and more collaborative and social. On the other hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more fragmented and chaotic, and more superficial and ephemeral. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more commodified and manipulated, and more isolated and addictive.

Next, let's look at the emergence of artificial intelligence and the virtual actors. Artificial intelligence is a term that describes the ability of machines and systems to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and decision making. Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and it is transforming various industries and domains, such as health, education, finance, and entertainment. Artificial intelligence is expected to become more powerful and pervasive in the next decade, and to challenge and change the way we live and work[^2^][2].

What does this mean for the future of Hollywood heroes? Well, it could mean that we will see more virtual actors and characters in the movies and the games, and even replace the real ones. For example, we could see more digital humans and avatars, and more deepfakes and de-aging, that can mimic the appearance and the performance of real actors and characters, or even create new ones. We could also see more generative and adaptive stories and scenarios, and more procedural and interactive content, that can create and modify the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes, or even generate new ones.

This could also mean that we will have less human actors and creators in the movies and the games, and even lose the real ones. For example, we could see less real actors and characters, and more synthetic and artificial ones, that can replace or surpass the real ones in terms of quality and cost. We could also see less human writers and directors, and more algorithmic and automated ones, that can produce or optimize the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes, or even eliminate the need for them.

The emergence of artificial intelligence and the virtual actors could have both positive and negative effects on the future of Hollywood heroes. On the one hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more realistic and impressive, and more dynamic and responsive. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more innovative and diverse, and more efficient and scalable. On the other hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more artificial and impersonal, and more predictable and repetitive. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more unethical and dangerous, and more uncontrollable and unpredictable.

Then, let's consider the evolution of the superhero genre and the cinematic universes. The superhero genre is a type of fiction that features characters who have extraordinary abilities or powers, and who use them for good or evil. The superhero genre is one of the most popular and profitable genres in Hollywood, and it has dominated the box office and the culture for the last two decades. The superhero genre is also one of the most diverse and adaptable genres in Hollywood, and it has evolved and expanded to include various subgenres and styles, such as comedy, horror, sci-fi, and fantasy.

What does this mean for the future of Hollywood heroes? Well, it could mean that we will see more superhero movies and games, and even more genres and formats. For example, we could see more superhero movies and games that are based on existing or new comic books, novels, or original stories, and that feature different or new heroes, villains, teams, or themes. We could also see more superhero movies and games that are in different or new genres or styles, such as musical, western, noir, or anime.

This could also mean that we will see more cinematic universes and cross-overs, and even more platforms and devices. For example, we could see more cinematic universes and cross-overs that are based on existing or new franchises, and that connect different or new movies, games, shows, or comics, and that feature different or new heroes, villains, worlds, or events. We could also see more cinematic universes and cross-overs that are on different or new platforms or devices, such as streaming, mobile, VR, or AR.

The evolution of the superhero genre and the cinematic universes could have both positive and negative effects on the future of Hollywood heroes. On the one hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more diverse and exciting, and more varied and adaptable. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more connected and immersive, and more accessible and interactive. On the other hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more saturated and exhausting, and more formulaic and derivative. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more confusing and overwhelming, and more exclusive and addictive.

Finally, let's examine the diversification of the representation and the audience. The representation is the way that the media portrays and depicts different groups of people, such as race, gender, sexuality, age, or disability. The representation is important for the media, as it reflects and influences the society and the culture, and as it affects the identity and the empowerment of the people. The representation is also changing for the media, as it becomes more diverse and inclusive, and as it challenges and subverts the stereotypes and the norms.

What does this mean for the future of Hollywood heroes? Well, it could mean that we will see more diverse and inclusive heroes and stories, and even more voices and perspectives. For example, we could see more heroes and stories that are from different or underrepresented backgrounds, cultures, or experiences, and that feature different or marginalized identities, issues, or values. We could also see more voices and perspectives that are from different or emerging creators, writers, or actors, and that offer different or alternative views and expressions of the heroes and the stories.

This could also mean that we will see more diverse and inclusive audience and fans, and even more engagement and participation. For example, we could see more audience and fans that are from different or underrepresented backgrounds, cultures, or experiences, and that have different or marginalized identities, issues, or values. We could also see more engagement and participation that are from different or emerging platforms, channels, or communities, and that involve different or creative forms and modes of the media.

The diversification of the representation and the audience could have both positive and negative effects on the future of Hollywood heroes. On the one hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more relevant and meaningful, and more diverse and inclusive. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more empowering and inspiring, and more engaging and participatory. On the other hand, it could make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more controversial and divisive, and more diverse and exclusive. It could also make the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes more politicized and polarized, and more challenging and complex.

As we can see, the future of Hollywood heroes is uncertain and exciting, and it will depend on various trends and predictions that are shaping the entertainment industry. The future of Hollywood heroes will also depend on us, the fans, and on how we consume and create the media, and how we react and respond to the changes that the media may have. Therefore, we should be curious and open-minded, and we should enjoy and appreciate the stories and the characters of our favorite heroes, and the stories and the characters of the new heroes that may emerge.

Here's the HTML code without the word count tags: ```html

Should we leave our heroes of teens and childhood alone or should we dig their graves in the multiverses?

By digging their graves in the multiverses, we mean exploring and altering the fate and the identity of our heroes in different or alternative realities, timelines, or dimensions, and creating new or different versions of them. This is something that Hollywood has been doing for a while, especially with the superhero genre and the cinematic universes, such as Marvel and DC. For example, we have seen different actors and interpretations of Spider-Man, Batman, Superman, and others, and we have seen different scenarios and outcomes for their stories, such as in the Avengers: Endgame or the Flashpoint.

But is this a good or a bad thing? Should we embrace or reject this trend? What are the pros and cons of digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses?

Some of the pros of digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses are:

• It can provide more variety and creativity. By digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses, we can enjoy more diverse and innovative stories and characters, and expand the scope and the possibilities of the media. We can also avoid repetition and boredom, and keep the media fresh and exciting.
• It can offer more fun and entertainment. By digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses, we can have more fun and entertainment, and experience more thrill and adventure. We can also have more choices and options, and customize and personalize our experiences.
• It can foster more curiosity and learning. By digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses, we can stimulate more curiosity and learning, and discover more about the media and ourselves. We can also challenge and improve our critical thinking and problem-solving skills, and develop more empathy and perspective-taking.

Some of the cons of digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses are:

• It can cause more confusion and inconsistency. By digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses, we can create more confusion and inconsistency, and make the media more complex and difficult to follow. We can also lose the coherence and the continuity of the media, and compromise the quality and the meaning of the stories and the characters.
• It can reduce more attachment and identification. By digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses, we can weaken more attachment and identification, and make the media more distant and detached. We can also diminish the legacy and the impact of the original or the classic stories and characters, and make them less memorable and iconic.
• It can result in more criticism and backlash. By digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses, we can face more criticism and backlash, and make the media more controversial and divisive. We can also alienate and upset the loyal and the passionate fans and buffs, and damage the reputation and the popularity of the media.

As we can see, digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses can have both positive and negative effects on us and on the media, and it can be a matter of preference and perspective. However, we should also remember that digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses is not a new or a unique phenomenon, and that it has been done for a long time and for various reasons. Therefore, maybe we should not be too quick to judge or reject the trend of digging the graves of our heroes in the multiverses, and maybe we should give it a chance and see how it plays out. After all, our heroes are not defined by their graves, but by their actions and their values, and by how they inspire and influence us. And no matter what Hollywood does to them, they will always live on in our hearts and minds.